Sushil Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
High Court
03 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Sushil Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
Date of order
03 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sushil Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22618 of 2011 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22618 of 2011
1.Sushil Kumar Sharma S/O Late Vindheyeshwari Sharma R/O At Dighi Kala, East Of Income Tax Office, P.O.- Dighi Kala, Hajipur, District- Vaishali
---Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna
3. The Under Secretary Management Mechanical Wing, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna
4. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) Water Resources Department, Patna 5. The Superintending Engineer Irrigation Mechanical Division, Birpur, Supaul 6. The Executive Engineer (Mechanical) Irrigation Mechanical Division, Darbhanga, Kosi Project Campus
7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna
8. The District Provident Fund Officer, Darbhanga
----Respondents.
----------------------------------
03 03.01.2012 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner on call to press this application. Same is the case with the respondents.
On 19.12.2011, this Court passed the following order:-
“None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Shri S.K.Jha, learned A.C. to A.A.G.5 appearing on behalf of the respondents is present. Put up this case tomorrow
(20.12.2011).”
The application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sym
( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.