Case LawHigh Court › Sushil Mohan v. The Income Tax Appellate...

Sushil Mohan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A-3, Ii Floor, Rajaji Bhavan

High Court 16 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Sushil Mohan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A-3, Ii Floor, Rajaji Bhavan
Date of order
16 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Sushil Mohan v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A-3, Ii Floor, Rajaji Bhavan, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: For the reasons stated in the said order dated 16.4.2018,the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is setaside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICEThe HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sushil Mohan .. Petitioner Vs. 1 The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A-3, II Floor, Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai – 90. 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax Authority Office of the Income Tax Officer Business Ward XIV (2) 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai – 600 034... Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus tocall for the records of the order of the first respondentdated 20.6.2017 and quash the same and remit the matter tothe first respondent, consequently directing the firstrespondent to pass just and appropriate orders on themeritsoftheappealofthepetitionerinI.T.A.No.1746/Mds/2015 in respect of the assessment year2009-10. For Petitioner : Ms.Rema Smrithi V.K. For Respondents: Mr.J.NarayanasamyStanding CounselORDER(Made by Ms.Indira Banerjee, Chief Justice) The issues involved in this writ petition are coveredby the judgment and order dated 16.4.2018 passed inW.P.No.8126 of 2018 [N.S.Mohan v. The Income Tax AppellateTribunal and another]. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. For the reasons stated in the said order dated 16.4.2018,the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is setaside. The learned Tribunal is directed to consider the matteron merits and take a fresh decision in accordance with law,preferably within 45 days from the date of communication of thisorder. Consequently, W.M.P.No.10303 and 10304 of 2018 areclosed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarsasiTo:1 The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal A-3, II Floor, Rajaji Bhavan Besant Nagar, Chennai – 90.2 The Commissioner of Income Tax Authority Office of the Income Tax Officer Business Ward XIV (2) 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam High Road Chennai – 600 034.+1cc to M/s.Rema Smirithi, Advocate, S.R.No.27990+1cc to Mr.J.Narayanasamy, Advocate, S.R.No.28499W.P.No.8330 of 2018SJ(CO) RRK(15/05/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan