In Suyash Rani v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In this view of the matter,the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty toseek revival as and when and if required.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CWP No.8637 of 1989Date of Decision: 29.07.2013
Suyash Rani
... Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the respondents.
*****
RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(Oral)
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. Evenotherwise as informed by counsel for the respondents, thepetitioner has passed away and no one has come forward to beimpleaded as a legal representative. In this view of the matter,the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty toseek revival as and when and if required.
(RAJIVE BHALLA)JUDGE
(DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue