Sweta Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara
High Court
13 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Sweta Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara
Date of order
13 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Sweta Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17701/2021
Sweta Jain D/o Shri Nirmal Kumar Jain, Aged About 37 Years,Having Address At Choudhary Sadan, Hameer Colony,Roopangarh Road, Madanganj Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan305801.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara, Having Its Address AtKawa Khera, Shashtri Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan 311001.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present.For Respondent(s): --
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
13/07/2023
On 01.02.2023 and 09.05.2023, learned counsel for thepetitioner had not put in appearance nor has despite time beinggranted deposited the process fees and notice. Even the interimorder, which was passed in favour of the petitioner, stands vacatedautomatically because of non-compliance of the order.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuingthe matter.
The petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH),CJ
33-a.asopa/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.