Symantee Software India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
High Court
26 Apr 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Symantee Software India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others
Date of order
26 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Symantee Software India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3195 OF 2010
Symantee Software India Private Limited..Petitioner.
Vs.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and others..Respondents.....
Mr. Alif Fazalbhoy with Mr. Subhash Jadhav i/b ALMT Legal for the Petitioner.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:
26 April, 2010.
In pursuance of the notice issued by this Court on 16 April 2010 to the Assessing Officer to remain present before the Court, Shri
Prashant Gadekar, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7, Pune is present before the Court. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the officer tenders an unconditional apology and
that he is ready and willing to pass a fresh order in accordance with law in compliance with the directions issued by this Court on 10 March 2010. The statement is recorded. In view of the statement
made before the Court, the impugned order passed by the First Respondent on 15 March 2010 is set aside together with the demand
notice dated 19 March 2010 consequential thereupon. The First Respondent, in terms of the statement made before the Court, shall pass a fresh order on the application for stay filed by the assessee on 9 March 2010 after complying with the previous directions issued by the Court on 10 March 2010. In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Assessing Officer, in terms whereof the present order has been passed, no further directions are sought in the proceedings. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. The Respondents shall abide by their statement.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.