Case LawHigh Court › T & R Welding Products (India) Ltd v. Th...

T & R Welding Products (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai Iii, Chennai

High Court 05 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
T & R Welding Products (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai Iii, Chennai
Date of order
05 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In T & R Welding Products (India) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Chennai Iii, Chennai, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For Appellant:Mr.T.N.SeetharamanFor Respondent :Mr.M.Swaminathan,Standing Counsel (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that heis not pressing the appeal and he has also made an endorsementto that effect. https://hcservices.ecour...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESHandTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH T.C.(A). No.506 of 2010 T & R Welding Products (India) Ltd.,No.29, Industrial Estate,Ambattur, Chennai - 58... Appellant vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai III, Chennai... Respondent Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "B"Bench, Chennai dated 06.11.2009 passed in C.O.No.141 inI.T.A.No.355/Mds/2009, against the order of the commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) in Appeal No.575/2006-07/AIII dated21.10.2008 and arising out of the Assessment order of the IncomeTax office Company ward III(1) with concurrent jurisdiction ofcom.circle III(2), Chennai-34 dated 16.11.2006 for the amendmentyear 2004-2005 in PAN No. . For Appellant:Mr.T.N.SeetharamanFor Respondent :Mr.M.Swaminathan,Standing Counsel (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that heis not pressing the appeal and he has also made an endorsementto that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counselfor the appellant, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed as notpressed. No costs. Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-ii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mmiTo1.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal Chennai III, Chennai.2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "B" Bench, Chennai.3. The Income Tax Officer, Company Ward III(1) with concurrentJurisdiction of Com. Circle III(2), Chennai-34.+1cc to Mr.M.SWAMINATHAN, Advocate, S.R.No.43506 T.C.(A).No.506 of 2010PPA(CO)TR(23/07/2018)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan