Case LawHigh Court › T.a v. M/S Panchwati Builders, Ranchi

T.a v. M/S Panchwati Builders, Ranchi

High Court 18 Jun 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a v. M/S Panchwati Builders, Ranchi
Date of order
18 Jun 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In T.a v. M/S Panchwati Builders, Ranchi, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in relying on the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court decided in the case of Smt.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI T.A. No. 23 of 2006 --- Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Patna, Patna --- ---Appellant Versus M/s Panchwati Builders, Ranchi -- -- -- Respondent --- Coram: Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocates For the Respondent: M/s Binod Poddar, Sr. Advocate, Amrita Sinha, Advocate --- Order No. 08Dated 28th November 2013 --- Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned senior counsel for the respondent. This appeal is admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law. A. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in relying on the judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court decided in the case of Smt. Amiya Bala Paul vs. CIT reported in 262 ITR 407 even after insertion of Section 142A of the income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15.11.72? B. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was correct in not relying on the Valuation Report in spite of the fact that the Valuation arrived was not challenged by the assessee? (R. Banumathi, C.J.) (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan