T.a./10/2005 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Anil Kumar
High Court
19 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./10/2005 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Anil Kumar
Date of order
19 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In T.a./10/2005 Of Commssioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Anil Kumar, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above reasons, these tax appeals are dismissed without any observation on the question of law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
T.A. No. 10 of 2005with
T.A. No. 11 of 2005
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna ...
...
Appellant
(in both appeals)
Vrs.
Sri Anil Kumar Prop. of M/s Anil Enterprises, Ranchi ......Respondent
(in both appeals)
------
CORAM:HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------For the Appellant:Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr. S.C.(Rev.)Ms. Rupa Kumari, Adv.Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv.For the Respondent:Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. ------
th September 2012.
Dated 19
Learned counsel for the appellants frankly admitted that in both the appeals tax effect is less than the limit for preferring the appeal by revenue i.e.,
Rs. 04 lakhs.
In view of the above reasons, these tax appeals are dismissed without any observation on the question of law.
(Prakash Tatia,C.J.)
(Jaya Roy, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue