In Ta/14/2001 Of Comnr.of Income Tax v. Miss.sarika Palo, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On this short ground, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TA No.14 of 2001
…. Appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa
Mr. T.K. Satapathy,
Senior Standing Counsel for IT Department -versus-
…. Respondent
Miss. Sarika Palo
None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
06.
ORDER
16.02.2022
1. This being a matter of 2001, the Court finds that in these twenty one years even service of notice on the Respondent has not been completed. In fact on the last occasion, it could not be served because of deficit stamps. On this short ground, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. The question of law framed is kept open for decision in some other appropriate cases.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S. Behera/M.Panda
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue