Case LawHigh Court › T.a./19/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

T.a./19/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.usha Prasad

High Court 18 Apr 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./19/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.usha Prasad
Date of order
18 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In T.a./19/2007 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt.usha Prasad, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 8 ofthe aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed.4.Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 19 of 2007 Commissioner of Income tax(Central) Central Revenue Building, 3rd Floor, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna ----------- Appellant Vrs. Smt. Usha Prasad, Prop.P.K. Enterprises W/o Dr. Satish Chandra, New Area, Morabadi, Ranhi---------- Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRAFor the Appellant: Mr.Deepak Roshan, AdvocateFor the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek, Advocate 16/Dated 18[th] April,2017Oral OrderPer D.N. Patel,J: 1.Counsels appearing for the parties submitted that the latest circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, i.e. CBDT Circular 21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015, gives revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals and the High Courts and for filing S.L.P. before the Hon'ble the Supreme Court. 2.As per the aforesaid circular, monetary limit with respect to High Courts has been enhanced to Rs. 20 Lakhs. This circular provides for some exceptions enumerated in Paragraph No. 10 thereof and looking to Paragraph No. 10 thereof, it appears that aforesaid instructions contained in the Circular is to be applied retrospectively to the pending appeals before the High Courts. Photocopy of the aforesaid circular is taken on record. 3.Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10th December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetarylimit involved in the present case is less than Rs. 20 lakhsand that thefacts of this case do not fall within the purview of the exceptions pointedout at paragraph no. 8 ofthe aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed.4.Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. ( D.N. Patel,J.) ( Ratnaker Bhengra,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan