T.a./36/2000 Of M/S R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ran
High Court
31 Oct 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./36/2000 Of M/S R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ran
Date of order
31 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In T.a./36/2000 Of M/S R.m.singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ran, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the above facts, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution as also, in view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
T.A. No. 36 of 2000
Sri R. M. Singh ...
... Appellant
Vrs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building Main Road, Ranchi ......Respondent
------
CORAM:HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
------
For the Appellant:NoneFor the Respondent:Mr. Deepak Roshan, Sr. S.C.(I.T.)Ms. Rupa Kumari, Adv.
st October, 2012.
Dated 31
No body appeared on behalf of the appellant.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue submitted that on earlier occasions also, no body appeared on behalf of the appellant, though no absence has been recorded in the order sheet. However, from the record, it appears that on 04.7.2012 and on 30.8.2012 also, no body appeared on behalf of the appellant.
In view of the above facts, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution as also, in view of the order passed in Tax Appeal No. 40 of 2000, which has been decided today on merit. The question of law involved in this tax appeal does not survive.
(Prakash Tatia,C.J.)
(Jaya Roy, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue