T.a./44/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Kumar Adukia
High Court
09 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./44/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Kumar Adukia
Date of order
09 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In T.a./44/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sanjay Kumar Adukia, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above reasons, this Tax Appeal has become infructuous and hence is dismissed having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI-----
Tax Appeal No. 44 of 2003
-----Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi........AppellantVersusSanjay Kumar Adukia............ Respondent
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROYFor the Appellant: M/s.Deepak Roshan, Sr.S.C.(I.T) Amit Kumar, Rupa Kumari, Advs.For the Respondent: M/s B.Poddar, Sr.AdvocateMahendra ChoudharyDarshan Poddar, Piyush PoddarAmrita Sinha, Advocates.-----
Dated, 9th January, 2013
Order No.10
Learned counsel for the respondent pointed out that
after reassessment order, fresh assessment order has already been passed on 24.12.2008.
In view of the above reasons, this Tax Appeal has become infructuous and hence is dismissed having become infructuous.
(Prakash Tatia, C. J.)
(Jaya Roy , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue