Case LawHigh Court › T.a./47/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

T.a./47/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Kavita Shah

High Court 01 Feb 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./47/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Kavita Shah
Date of order
01 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In T.a./47/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. Kavita Shah, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No.47 of 2011 withI.A. No. 3734 of 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax(Central),Patna ....Appellant-Versus-Kavita Shah...Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE JAYA ROY .... For the Appellant : Mr.D.Roshan,Adv.For the Respondent: xxxx Order no.06 Dated 2nd April, 2013 1.Though notice was sent to the respondent under registered cover, the same has not been returned, either served or unserved. 2.In view of the above, presumption is drawn that notice has been served. 3.Heard learned counsel for the appellant on the application for condonation of delay being I.A. No. 3734 of 2011, which has been filed for condonation of delay of 19 days. 4.In view of the reasons stated in the application, I.A.No. 3734 of 2011 is allowed and the delay is condoned. 5.List this matter for admission after two weeks. (Prakash Tatia, C.J. ) G.Jha/ ( Jaya Roy, J )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan