Case LawHigh Court › Ta/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income...

Ta/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Pramod Suwalal Bumb

High Court 29 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Ta/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Pramod Suwalal Bumb
Date of order
29 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ta/68/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Pramod Suwalal Bumb, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 78 of 2007, the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2008 WITH TAX APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2008 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for the appellantShri M.K. Kulkarni with Shri R.R. Chandak, Advocates for respondent. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Order Reserved on : 12th July, 2011. Order pronounced on : 29th July, 2011. .For the reasons stated by us in the judgment in Tax Appeal No. 76 of 2007 and Tax Appeal No. 78 of 2007, the appeals are dismissed. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/ta 68.08
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan