T.a./70/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Salima Kunzni
High Court
16 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
T.a./70/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Salima Kunzni
Date of order
16 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In T.a./70/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms. Salima Kunzni, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI-----
Tax Appeal No. 70 of 2008WithI.A. No. 2094 of 2012
For the Appellant: Mr. Deepal Roshan, AdvocateFor the Respondent: -----
Order No. 18Dated, 17th December, 2012
Heard learned counsel for the parties on the I.A. No. 2094 of 2012.
The counsel for the appellant submitted that the assessee has died and prayed for substitution of his legal representative. The sole respondent left behind her only one legal heir.
Learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of legal representative and has no objection in impleading Ms. Salima Kunzni as party respondent in this appeal. Therefore, I.A. No. 2094 of 2012 is allowed.
Ms. Salima Kunzni is added as party respondent as legal heir of respondent no.1.
Necessary correction may be made in the original file itself.
Copy of the order be given to the counsel for the newly added party.
(Prakash Tatia, C. J.)
(Jaya Roy , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue