Case LawHigh Court › Taj Sats Air Catering Limitedversus v. T...

Taj Sats Air Catering Limitedversus v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 03 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Taj Sats Air Catering Limitedversus v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Taj Sats Air Catering Limitedversus v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 4 The appeal is accordingly allowed by answering the question in the negative and in favour of the appellant-assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1096 OF 2012 Taj Sats Air Catering Limitedversus versus ..Appellant The Commissioner of Income Tax..Respondent -------- Mr. Prakash Shah alongwith Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b PDS Legal for the Appellant. Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for the Respondent. ............. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 03[rd] September, 2012 P.C. : 1 This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28.05.2009, in ITA No. 2844/Mum/2007 pertaining to the assessment year 2003-2004. 2 The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that depreciation is not allowed on goodwill?” 3It is stated by both the Advocates for the appellant and respondent that the question of law sought to be raised is covered in favour of the appellant-assessee by the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 22.08.2012 in CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd. in Civil Appeal No. 5961 of 2012. 4 The appeal is accordingly allowed by answering the question in the negative and in favour of the appellant-assessee. No order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan