Tapan Kr. Chowdhury v. Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors
High Court
07 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Tapan Kr. Chowdhury v. Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors
Date of order
07 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tapan Kr. Chowdhury v. Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Since a stop order was passed and yet the appellant is not ready to argue the case, therefore, the appeal (ITA/89/2011) is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA/89/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
TAPAN KR. CHOWDHURY
-Versus-
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX &ORS.
BEFORE :THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANIAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 7[th] February, 2024
Appearance:Mr. Somak Basu, Adv....for the appellant.Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv....for the respondent.
1.Mr. Somak Basu, learned counsel for the appellant has appeared throughvirtual mode. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel forthe respondent/department is present.virtual mode. Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel forthe respondent/department is present.
2.On 15.01.2024 this Court passed the following order:
“The Court: When the matter was called on none appears onbehalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent/ IncomeTax Department is present.
List the matter in the monthly list of February, 2024, so as togive a last chance to the appellant to argue this old appeal.”
3.Despite the afore-quoted stop order, learned counsel for the appellant hasinsisted to adjourn the appeal.insisted to adjourn the appeal.
4.Since a stop order was passed and yet the appellant is not ready to argue
the case, therefore, the appeal (ITA/89/2011) is dismissed.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
As.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.