Tarun Soni v. The Principal Director Of Income Tax(Investigation),Jaipurjaipur
High Court
14 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Tarun Soni v. The Principal Director Of Income Tax(Investigation),Jaipurjaipur
Date of order
14 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tarun Soni v. The Principal Director Of Income Tax(Investigation),Jaipurjaipur, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14566/2019
Tarun Soni S/o Shri Mahesh Soni, Aged About 36 Years, R/o FlatNo-301, Plot No-47, Lane No-06, Dharampark Colony, AjmerRoad, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Principal Director Of Income Tax(Investigation),JaipurJaipur
2. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Income Tax Department, Jaipur.1, Income Tax Department, Jaipur.
----Respondents
2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14565/2019
M/s S.s Constructions, 201, 46, Lane No.6 Dharam ParkColony, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-302019 (Rajasthan), Through ItsPartner Shri Tarun Soni S/o Shri Mahesh Soni, Aged About 36Years, R/o Flat No-301, Plot No-47 , Lane No-06, DharamparkColony, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Principal Director Of Income Tax(Investigation),JaipurJaipur
2. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, CentralCircle-1, Income Tax Department , Jaipur.Circle-1, Income Tax Department , Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mahendra GargieyaFor Respondent(s): For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
14/10/2019
Order
Learned counsel submitted that in the present writ petitions,the petitioners have challenged the notices issued under Section153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act of1961”) for the Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2017-18.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filingof the writ petitions, the Assessing Officer has decided in thefavour of the petitioners by holding that notices issued underSection 153A of the Act of 1961 were wrongly issued, as thesearch warrant was not issued in the name of the petitioners.
Learned counsel submitted that though the proceedingsunder Section 153A of the Act of 1961 has been withdrawn afterapproval, however, the proceedings under Section 153C of the Actof 1961 has been initiated on the basis of some seized materialvide notice dated 20[th] September, 2019.
This Court finds that challenge to the notices issued underSection 153A of the Act of 1961 do not survive in view of thesubsequent order passed by the Authority concerned.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petitions do notrequire any adjudication and the same are dismissed, as renderedinfructuous.
A copy of this order be separately placed in connected file.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.