In Tata Communications Ltd v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 1(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HEMANTCHANDERSENSHIV
Digitallysigned byHEMANTCHANDERSENSHIVDate:2022.09.2311:05:56+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73 OF 2008
Tata Communications Ltd. vs.
...Appellant.
Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Range 1(3), Mumbai
...Respondent
*****
Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil R. Wani & Ms. Supriya S. Devergudi i/b ANS Law Associates for the Appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
*****
CORAM :
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
16[th] SEPTEMBER 2022
DATE :
P. C.:-
1.Copy of Memo of Appeal be furnished to learned counsel for therespondent. respondent.
2.Liberty is granted to file paper-book.
3.List the appeal on 8th December 2022.
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue