Tata Communications Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 1(3)(2) & Ors
High Court
10 Jun 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tata Communications Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 1(3)(2) & Ors
Date of order
10 Jun 2019
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tata Communications Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 1(3)(2) & Ors, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.WRIT PETITION NO. 964 OF 2019
Tata Communications Ltd..Petitioner
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 1(3)(2) & Ors...Respondents
...................
Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkari/by Mint & Confreres for the Petitioner Mr. J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Upendra Lokegaonkari/by Mint & Confreres for the Petitioner
Mr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for the RespondentsMr. Charanjeet Chanderpal for the Respondents
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 10, 2019.
P.C.:
1.The petitioner’s short grievance is that its return ofincome for the assessment year 2016-17 has not yet beenprocessed by the Assessing Officer. As a result, thepetitioner is not paid the refund of sizable amount arisingout of such return. On 25.4.2019, after recording thecontroversy in brief, we had given time to the learnedcounsel for the Respondents upto 6.6.2019 for filing reply, ifany.
2.Learned counsel Mr. Chanderpal for the Departmentstated that he does not wish to file any reply. He, instead,stated that the petitioner’s return in question would beprocessed within four weeks from today. Whatever be theconsequences of the process of return, would obviously befollowed.
3.Petition disposed of in view of the above statement.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.