Case LawHigh Court › Tata Teleservices Ltd v. Assistant Commi...

Tata Teleservices Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ]Income [Tax ][Tds ][And Anr

High Court 28 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tata Teleservices Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ]Income [Tax ][Tds ][And Anr
Date of order
28 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tata Teleservices Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ]Income [Tax ][Tds ][And Anr, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The prayer for withdrawal [is ][accepted ][and ][the ][writ ][petition ][is]dismissed as withdrarvn with liberfy [as ][prayed ][for. ][It ][is directed that ][the]respondent will not take coercive [steps ][to ][recover ][the ][impugned]demand, if any, pertaining to [the ][period mentioned ][in ][the...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

t I $-33-37* IN THE HIGH COURT + W.P.(C)Nos. 202412011,2026120t1,202712011,203012011& 2032120rt TATA TELESERVICES LTD..... PetitionerThrough Mr. Dushyant Dave, [Sr. ][Adv.]with Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME Mr. Abhish"k rhrough M';,}iTTi*'Standing Counsel with Ms'Anshul Sharma, Adv. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE [R.V.EASWAR] ORDER28.LL.201r % Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. [Advocate ][appearing ][for ][the ][petitioner]seeks permission to withdraw the [present ][writ ][petition ][with ][liberry ][to]file a fresh writ petition, [in ][which ][they ][want ][to ][challenge ][vires ][of ][the]proviso to Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act, [1961 inserted ][by ][the]Finance (i.lo.2) Act,2009 with [effect ][from ][l't ][April, ][2010. ][He fuither]submits that the petitioner [should be ][permitted ][to ][raise grounds ][and]contentions, which have been raised in [the present ][writ ][petition. ][It ][is]submitted that the [constitutional ][validity of ][the ][proviso is ][required to]be challenged in view of the [decisions ][of ][this Court ][in ][Commissioner]of Income Tsx Vs. NHK Japan [Broadcssting Corporution ][2008J [305] t ITR 137 [(Delhi) ]and Commissioner [of Income ][Tax ][Vs. ][Hutcltison] Essar Telecome Lt(l., [2010J 323 [(Delhi). ][It ][is ][further ][prayed]that the interim order [passed ]by [the Court directing that ][no ][coercive]steps shall be taken may be [continued ][for ][a ][period ][of ][15 days ][to ][enable]the petitioner to file a fresh writ [petition.] We have heard the statement made by [the ][learned ][senior]counsel. The prayer for withdrawal [is ][accepted ][and ][the ][writ ][petition ][is]dismissed as withdrarvn with liberfy [as ][prayed ][for. ][It ][is directed that ][the]respondent will not take coercive [steps ][to ][recover ][the ][impugned]demand, if any, pertaining to [the ][period mentioned ][in ][the ][writ ][petition]for a period of 15 days from [today.] 4- "l ,l l' r,-rSANJIV KHANNA, J. t.[Al .._,n.v.BaswAR, J. NOVEMBER 28, 20rlNA (
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan