Tata Teleservices [Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ][Income ][Tax ][Tds ][And Anr
High Court
28 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tata Teleservices [Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ][Income ][Tax ][Tds ][And Anr
Date of order
28 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tata Teleservices [Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [Of ][Income ][Tax ][Tds ][And Anr, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The prayer for withdrawal [is ][accepted ][and ][the ][writ ][petition ][is]dismissed as withdrawn with [liberty ][as ][prayed ][for. ][It ][is directed that the]will not take [coercive steps ][to ][recover ][the ][impugned]respondent demand, if any, pertaining to [the ][period mentioned ][in ][the...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
r{
.4."o
$-33-37* tN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
+ W.P.(C) Nos. 202412011,202612011,202712011,203012011& 203212011
TATA TELESERVICES ..... PetitionerThrough Mr. DushYant [Dave, ][Sr. ][Adv.]with Ms. Surekha Raman, [Adv.]
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
rhrough Mr.Abhish"kM';rli'lTrl*'Standing Counsel with [Ms.]Anshul Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE [R.V.EASWAR]
ononn
28.L1,.201L
o
Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. [Advocate ][appearing ][for ][the ][petitioner]seeks permission to [withdraw ][the ][present ][writ ][petition ][with ][liberty ][to]file a fresh writ [petition, ][in ][which ][they ][want ][to ][challenge ][vires ][of ][the]proviso to Section [2Ot(3) ][of ][the ][Income Tax ][Act, ][1961 inserted ][by ][the]Finance [(No.2) ]Act,2009 [with ][effect ][from ][1" ][April, ][2010. ][He further]submits that the [petitioner ][should be ][permitted ][to ][raise ][grounds ][and]contentions, which have [been ][raised ][in ][the ][present ][writ ][petition. ][It ][is]submitted that the constitutional [validity of ][the ][proviso is ][required ][to]in [view ][of ][the ][decisions ][of this Court ][in ][Commissioner]be challenged of Income Tax Vs. NHK [Jopun ][Broudcasting Corporution ][[2008J 305]
7I
-t'a
ITR 137 [(Delhi) ]and Commissioner [of ][Income ][Tax ][Vs. ][Hutcltison]
Essur Telecome Ltd., [2010J [323 ] [(Delhi). ][It ][is ][further ][prayed]that the interim order [passed ][by ][the Court directing that ][no ][coercive]steps shall be taken may be [continued ][for ][a ][period ][of ][15 days ][to ][enable]the petitioner to file a fresh writ [petition.]
We have heard the statement [made ][by ][the ][learned ][senior]counsel. The prayer for withdrawal [is ][accepted ][and ][the ][writ ][petition ][is]dismissed as withdrawn with [liberty ][as ][prayed ][for. ][It ][is directed that the]will not take [coercive steps ][to ][recover ][the ][impugned]respondent demand, if any, pertaining to [the ][period mentioned ][in ][the ][writ ][petition]for a period of 15 days from [todaY.]
-'U '/''l / ,-l- lrSANJIV KTIANNA, J.
liln-\ oaa-7 [.]R.V.EASWAR, J.
NOVEMBER 28, 20LlNA,/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.