Case Law › High Court › Tata Teleservices Ltd v. The Assistant C...

Tata Teleservices Ltd v. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax

High Court 21 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

21 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Tata Teleservices Ltd v. The Assistant Commissionerof Income Tax, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~46 to 48 & 31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 6163/2017 TATA TELESERVICES LTD. ..... PetitionerThrough :Mr.TarunGulati,Mr.SparshBhargava, Ms. Rachana Yadav andMr. Anupam Mishra, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX ..... RespondentThrough :Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior StandingCounsel. With + W.P.(C) 6164/2017 TATA TELESERVICES LTD. ..... PetitionerThrough :Mr.TarunGulati,Mr.SparshBhargava, Ms. Rachana Yadav andMr. Anupam Mishra, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX ..... RespondentThrough :Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior StandingCounsel. With + W.P.(C) 6165/2017 TATA TELESERVICES LTD. ..... PetitionerThrough :Mr.TarunGulati,Mr.SparshBhargava, Ms. Rachana Yadav and Mr. Anupam Mishra, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX ..... RespondentThrough :Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior StandingCounsel. With + W.P.(C) 6096/2017 TATA TELESERVICES LTD. ..... PetitionerThrough :Mr.TarunGulati,Mr.SparshBhargava, Ms. Rachana Yadav andMr. Anupam Mishra, Advocates. versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX ..... RespondentThrough :Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior StandingCounsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R%21.07.2017 -W.P.(C) 6163/2017 & CM No.25645/2017 (adinterim stay)-W.P.(C) 6164/2017 & CM No.25646/2017 (adinterim stay)-W.P.(C) 6165/2017 & CM No.25647/2017 (adinterim stay) -W.P.(C) 6096/2017 & CM No.25297/2017 (adinterim stay)1. The petitions challenge the order dated 7[th]April 2017 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the stay applications filed by thePetitioner in the pending appeals for Financial Years 2006-07 to 2010-11. An identical petition being W.P. (C) 5965 of 2017 filed by the samePetitioner has been disposed of by this Court by an order dated 18[th]July2017. 2. The present petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 18[th]July,2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5965/2017 (titled TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX) setting aside the impugned order dated 7[th]April 2017 of the ITAT andquashing the demand notices Dated 6[th]July 2017 issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 and restoring the Petitioner’s stayapplications to the file of the ITAT for a fresh disposal in accordance withlaw. The ITAT should endeavour to dispose of the said applications withinsix weeks from the date it receives a copy of this order. S.MURALIDHAR, J JULY 21, 2017dk PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.