Tax-12 v. M/S. Dowells Electro Werke
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-12 v. M/S. Dowells Electro Werke
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-12 v. M/S. Dowells Electro Werke, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the dismissal of the notice of motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1228 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1228 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1228 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 686 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 686 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 686 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income
Tax-12. .. Appellant.
vs.
M/s. Dowells Electro Werke. .. Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.
None for Respondents.
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant.
None appears for the Respondents. By this Notice of
Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 502
days delay caused in filing the Appeal.
2. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice
of Motion. It appears that though the impugned order
was passed on 16.05.2006 and the Commissioner of Income
2
Tax had granted approval for filing an Appeal on
06.10.2006. However, the Appeal came to be lodged
belatedly on 5.3.2008 i.e. almost after a lapse of 16
months.
3. We are not satisfied with the reasons given for
delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared
as well as non-availability of court fee stamps. No
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.
Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
4. In view of the dismissal of the notice of
motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue