Case LawHigh Court › Tax-14 v. M/S. Shree Laxmi Enterprises

Tax-14 v. M/S. Shree Laxmi Enterprises

High Court 08 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-14 v. M/S. Shree Laxmi Enterprises
Date of order
08 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax-14 v. M/S. Shree Laxmi Enterprises, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1871 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1650 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ..Appellant Vs. M/s. Shree Laxmi Enterprises ..Respondent Mr. S.M. Shah for appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & D.B. BHOSALE,JJ. Dated: July 08, 2008. Dated: July 08, 2008. Dated: July 08, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Shah the learned counsel for the appellant-revenue. Income Tax Appeal Lodging No. 1650 of 2008 has been filed against the common order dated 10/12/2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal but belatedly and hence this Notice of Motion for delay condonation. The Assessee has been served with a notice on this notice of motion and affidavit of service has been filed. 2. The appeal is beyond time by 15 days and :2: having gone through the affidavit of Shri R.B. Mehta, Income Tax Officer in support of this Motion, we are satisfied that the delay caused deserves to be condoned. 3. Hence the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. List the appeal for admission before the appropriate bench. (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.)(B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (D.B. Bhosale, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan