In Tax 14 v. Shri Venkatachalam Krishnamurthy, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No. 809 of 2008
The Commissioner of Income
Tax 14 ..Appellant
vs.
Shri Venkatachalam Krishnamurthy ..Respondent
Mr.Shivsharan for appellant.
Mr.J.Singh i/b Mr.K.Gopal for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 14th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
14th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal as tax liability is less than
Rs.4,00,000/-. Hence, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded
to the appellant as per rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue