Case LawHigh Court › Tax-18 v. M/S Metropolitan Trading Co

Tax-18 v. M/S Metropolitan Trading Co

High Court 22 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-18 v. M/S Metropolitan Trading Co
Date of order
22 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax-18 v. M/S Metropolitan Trading Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In view thereof appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 804 of 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18 ..Appellant vs. M/s Metropolitan Trading Co. ..Respondent Mr.K.R.Choudhari for appellant. Ms.Vasant B.Patel for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 22nd September,2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 22nd September,2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing the respondent. 2. We have heard the learned Counsel for some time. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Mr.Choudhari states that the appellant is not pressing the above appeal in view of decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bangalore Clothing reported in 260 ITR 371. In view thereof appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan