Tax 18Mumbai v. Mr.r.g.bhatt For
High Court
04 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax 18Mumbai v. Mr.r.g.bhatt For
Date of order
04 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax 18Mumbai v. Mr.r.g.bhatt For, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.3736 OF 2006inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2150of 2006The Commissioner of IncomeTax 18Mumbai.. Appellant
vs
vs
vs
M/s B.J.Nichani Hotels.Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhatt for AppellantMr.A.R.Singh for RespondentCORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJDATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2007
P.C.
1. The delay is less than 200 days. Consideringthe practical difficulties which the department wasfacing including referring the matters to the LawDepartment, Government of India for drafting theAppeal Memo and considering the affidavit insupport of the Notice of Motion, in our opinion,the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause.Hence, delay condoned. The Notice of Motion isallowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Office to register the appeal.
(F.I.Rebello, J)
(R.S.Mohite, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue