In Tax 3 v. Suraj Diamond Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1192 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income
Tax 3 ..Appellant
vs.
Suraj Diamond Industries Ltd. ..Respondent
None for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
P.C.
P.C.
1. The above matter was on board on 11th July, 2008.
Mr.Gupta sought one week’s time to file vakalatnama.
Accordingly the appeal was adjourned to 18th July, 2008.
Even on 18th July, 2008 Mr.Gupta assured to file the
vakalatnama. We had further adjourned the appeal for one
week as a last chance. Today, Mr.Gupta is not present.
Mr.Jasani, the learned Counsel for the respondent is
present. Appeal stands dismissed in default.
(S.J
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue