Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N Twist
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N Twist
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Bhilosa Tex-N Twist, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view thereof, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 171 OF 2008
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 171 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income
Tax-4, Mumbai. .. Appellant.
vs.
M/s. Bhilosa Tex-N Twist
P. Ltd., .. Respondent.
Mr. R. Ashokan for Appellant.
Mr. Sridharan i/by PDS Legal for Respondent.
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C.
. By consent of both the parties the appeal is
taken up on Board for hearing.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant as well
as for the respondent categorically state that the
question of law involved in the present appeal is
squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in
Income Tax Appeal No. 1393 of 00 dated 27.2.2008
2
against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. In
view thereof, the appeal stands dismissed.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue