Tax-4 v. Gulbarga Ass0Ciates(P)Limited
High Court
17 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax-4 v. Gulbarga Ass0Ciates(P)Limited
Date of order
17 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-4 v. Gulbarga Ass0Ciates(P)Limited, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~.*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
15 to 19
+ITA 145/2017 and CM No. 145/2017 and CM No. and CM No. CM No. No. 5386/2017PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Ihrough Mr. Ashok Ashok Kumar, Advocate
ITA 145/2017 and CM No. 145/2017 and CM No. and CM No. CM No. No. 5386/2017
TAX-4 ..... AppellantMr. Ashok Ashok Kumar, Advocate
+
versus
GULBARGA ASS0CIATES(P)LIMITED
ASS0CIATES(P)LIMITED RespondentThrough Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. RashmiSingh, Advocates
WITH^^TA 149/2017 and CM No. 6057/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4
Appellant
Through
versus
GULBARGA ASSOCIATES (P)LIMITBD
Respondent
Through
Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. RashmiSingh, Advocates
+
AND
ITA 150/2017 and CM No. 6062/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4
Appellant
Through
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
versus
GULBRGA ASSOCIATES (P)LIMITED
Respondent
Through
Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi
Singh, Advocates
+
AND
ITA 166/2017 and CM No.7341/2017
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedBy:AMULYA
+
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
Appellant
Through Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
versusGULBARGA ASSOCIATES (?) LIMITED
versusASSOCIATES (?) LIMITED (?) LIMITED LIMITED RespondentThrough Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. RashmiSingh, Advocates
AND
ITA 173/2017 and CM No. 7795/2017
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.4
OF INCOME TAX.4 INCOME TAX.4 TAX.4 AppellantThrough Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocateversus(P)LIMITED RespondentThrough Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. RashmiSingh, Advocates
versusGULBRAGA ASSOCIATES (P)LIMITED
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
ORDER%17.04.2017
1. The issues raised by the Revenue in these appeals are answeredagainst it and in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this court inPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nikki Drugs andChemicals P. Ltd., (2016), 386ITR 680 (Del).2. The as well as are appeals pending applications accordinglydismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
NAW WAZIRI, J
APRIL 17,2017/b
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.