In Tax-4 v. M/S Baluka Drugs Limited, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal stands dismissed in default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income
Tax-4 ..Appellant
vs.
M/s Baluka Drugs Limited ..Respondents
None for appellant
None for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN& S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.25th July 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
25th July 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. The above matter was adjourned at the request of
Mr.Vimal Gupta to this date by our order dated 18th July,
2008. Today also Mr.Gupta is not present. None appears
for the respondent. Appeal stands dismissed in default.
(S.J
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.