Tax-4 v. M/S. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-4 v. M/S. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-4 v. M/S. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 676 OF 2008
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 676 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 105 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 105 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 105 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income
Tax-4. .. Appellant.
vs.
M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr. R. Asokan for Appellant.
Dr. L.S. Jain for Respondent.
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 69 days delay caused in filing the
Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion,
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay,
and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of
2
bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on Board for admission in the
month of September, 2008, subject to numbering.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue