Tax-8 v. M/S. Nucleus Securities
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-8 v. M/S. Nucleus Securities
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-8 v. M/S. Nucleus Securities, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1138 OF 2008
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1138 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 682 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 682 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 682 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income
Tax-8. .. Appellant.
vs.
M/s. Nucleus Securities
Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant.
None appears for the Respondent. By this Notice of
Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 35 days
delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons
stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of
Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of
2
delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or
want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence,
the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on Board for admission in the
month of September, 2008, subject to numbering.
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue