Case LawHigh Court › Tax Appeal v. Barashiv Hanuman Ssk Ltd....

Tax Appeal v. Barashiv Hanuman Ssk Ltd. Jawala Bazar

High Court 04 Apr 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Tax Appeal v. Barashiv Hanuman Ssk Ltd. Jawala Bazar
Date of order
04 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Tax Appeal v. Barashiv Hanuman Ssk Ltd. Jawala Bazar, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: (2)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in allowing interest on funds borrowed for the purposes of making interest free advances to the harvesting and transport contractors, as deductible expenditure ?" 3.In the Tax Appeal No.

Decision: Hence this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2010THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVERSUSBARASHIV HANUMAN SSK LTD. JAWALA BAZAR ... ASG for Appellant : Shri Alok Sharma ...CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & S. B. DESHMUKH, JJ.Dated: April 4, 2012... PER COURT :- 1.Heard respective counsel. 2.The questions of law, that have been urged by Shri Sharma, learned ASG are:- "(1)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the advances to Harvesting and Transport Contractors are in the nature of business advances ? (2)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in allowing interest on funds borrowed for the purposes of making interest free advances to the harvesting and transport contractors, as deductible expenditure ?" 3.In the Tax Appeal No. 52 of 2010 ( The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.Purna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.) vide our order dated 28.2.2012, Division Bench of this Court, to which one of us was a party, (Coram : D.G.Karnik & S.B.Deshmukh,JJ.) has answered both the issues in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Hence this appeal is dismissed. ( S. B. DESHMUKH, J. ) ( NARESH H.PATIL, J. )...
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan