Case LawHigh Court › Tax Appeal v. Dated 19[Th] September,201...

Tax Appeal v. Dated 19[Th] September,2016Oral Order

High Court 19 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Tax Appeal v. Dated 19[Th] September,2016Oral Order
Date of order
19 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax Appeal v. Dated 19[Th] September,2016Oral Order, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 8 of the aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Tax Appeal No. 4 of 2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax ( Central), Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, P.O.-GPO, P.S.- Kotwali, District-Patna---Appellant Versus Smt. Bina Modi, resident of 11/1B, New Road, Alipur, P.O. & P.S.- Alipur, District- Kolkata, PIN-700027 ---Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRAFor the Appellant:Mr. Deepak RoshanFor the Respondent: 12/Dated 19[th] September,2016Oral Order Per D.N. Patel,J: 1.Counsels appearing for the parties submitted that the latest circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, i.e. CBDT Circular 21/2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015, gives revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals and the High Courts and for filing S.L.P. before Hon'ble the Supreme Court. 2.As per the aforesaid circular, monetary limit with respect to High Courts has been enhanced to Rs. 20 lakhs. This circular provides for some exceptions enumerated in Paragraph No. 10 thereof and looking to Paragraph No. 10 thereof, it appears that aforesaid instructions contained in the Circular is to be applied retrospectively to the pending appeals before the High Courts. Photocopy of the aforesaid circular is taken on record. 3.Having heard counsels for both sides and looking to the Circular dated 10[th] December, 2015 and also looking to the facts that monetary limit involved in the present case is less than Rs.20 lakhsand that the facts of this case do not fall within thepurview of the exceptions pointed out at paragraph no. 8 of the aforesaid circular, this appeal is dismissed. 4.Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. ( D.N. Patel,J.) ( Ratnaker Bhengra,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan