Tax Appeal v. Dated: 24Th January, 2018(Oral Order)Per D.n. Patel, Acj
High Court
24 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Tax Appeal v. Dated: 24Th January, 2018(Oral Order)Per D.n. Patel, Acj
Date of order
24 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tax Appeal v. Dated: 24Th January, 2018(Oral Order)Per D.n. Patel, Acj, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, this Tax Appeal has become infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed as being infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tax Appeal No.03 of 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Patna …Appellant
Versus
Smt. Ajanta Sanyal …...…......Respondent
------
CORAM:HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
-----
For the Appellant:M/s. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent:M/s. M.K. Choudhary, Advocate
------
20/Dated: 24th January, 2018(Oral order)Per D.N. Patel, ACJ.
1)Having heard learned counsels for both sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the authority has passed an order on 24th November, 2014, whereby the matter was remanded for fresh assessment to the Assessing Officer.
2)It further appears from the facts that re-assessment order has already been passed by the Assessing Officer on 28th March, 2016 and it is also conveyed that the respondent-assessee has taken further recourse into the matter after receiving copy of the fresh assessment order. Hence, this Tax Appeal has become infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed as being infructuous.
(D. N. Patel, ACJ)
(Amitav K. Gupta, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.