In Tax Appeal v. Bhadang, Jj, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Satish
1 TXA13/2018
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO.13 OF 2018
The Principal Commissioner ofIncome …Tax, PanajiAppellantVersus...Minguel Jose RodriguesRespondent
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the appellant.Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar &
C.
V. Bhadang, JJ.
Date : 10[th] August 2018.
P.C.:
The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant states that shehas received instructions to withdraw the appeal in view of theCircular No.3/2018 dated 11 July 2018 issued by the CBDT as thetax effect involved in the appeal is below the limit stipulated in theCircular.
2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
C. V. Bhadang, J.N.M. Jamdar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue