Tax Appeal v. Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj
High Court
16 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Tax Appeal v. Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj
Date of order
16 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tax Appeal v. Nutan D. Sardessai, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, this Appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 txa58-06.dt.16-7-19
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ….Appellant. Versus ….Damodar Mangalji Mining Company. Respondent.
Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : M.S. Sonak &
Nutan D. Sardessai, JJ.
Date : 16[th] July, 2019.
P.C.:-
Ms. Linhares, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellantfairly states that the relief in the present Appeal has been renderedinfructuous, in view of the decision of this Court dated 23[rd] June,2009 in Tax Appeal No.8/2004, which was in fact a connectedmatter. Ms. V. Palyekar, learned Counsel for the Respondent alsosupports the submission made by Ms. Linhares and urges disposal ofthis Appeal on the ground that the same has been renderedinfructuous.
2.Accordingly, this Appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
Nutan D. Sardessai, J. M.S. Sonak, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue