Tax Appeal v. M/S. Philcorp Holdings Ltd., …
High Court
26 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Tax Appeal v. M/S. Philcorp Holdings Ltd., …
Date of order
26 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tax Appeal v. M/S. Philcorp Holdings Ltd., …, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Issue: But so far we have not informed as to whether theappeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in the CBDT Circular.In view of the fact that the policy is to reduce the litigations, we are ofthe opinion that the appeal can be disposed of by giving liberty to theAppellant-Revenue if upon examination...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Amrut
1
TXA64-08dt 26-10-2018
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
TAX APPEAL NO.64 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax…Appellant
Versus
M/s. Philcorp Holdings Ltd., …. Respondent
Ms. A. Razaq holding for Ms. S. Linhares, Standing Counsel for theAppellant.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 26 October 2018.
P.C. :
This appeal has tax effect of Rs.4 lakhs. The appeal waslisted on board in view of the CBDT Circular dated 11 July 2018. On27 August 2018, the learned Standing Counsel had sought time totake instructions. No instructions apparently have been received bythe learned Standing Counsel from the Appellant. The CBDTCircular dated 11 July 2018 stipulates that if the tax effect is belowRs.50 lakhs, as per the policy, the appeal is not to be pursued. Thereare however certain exceptions to the tax effect below Rs.50 lakhs to
Amrut
2 TXA64-08dt 26-10-2018
pursue the appeal. But so far we have not informed as to whether theappeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in the CBDT Circular.In view of the fact that the policy is to reduce the litigations, we are ofthe opinion that the appeal can be disposed of by giving liberty to theAppellant-Revenue if upon examination it is found that the appealfalls in one of the exceptions to revive the appeal. The appeal standsdisposed of in view of the CBDT Circular dated 11 July 2018 withthe liberty as above. The application for restoration, if any, will be filedwithin six weeks from today.
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.N.M. Jamdar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.