Tax Appeal v. Bhadang, Jj
High Court
18 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Tax Appeal v. Bhadang, Jj
Date of order
18 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Tax Appeal v. Bhadang, Jj, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Accordingly, we allow the withdrawal of these appeals.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOATAX APPEAL NO.48 OF 2012WITHTAX APPEAL NOS.7, 8, 10 AND 11 OF 2014TAX APPEAL NO.56 OF 2015
ANDTAX APPEAL NO.9 OF 2017
TAX APPEAL NO.48 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax... Appellant V e r s u sRadha S. Timblo... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
WITH
TAX APPEAL NOS.7 AND 10 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax…Appellant V e r s u sShamshun Muktar Shaikh…Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Ms. Shambhavi Rao, Advocate for the Respondent.
TAX APPEAL NOS.8 AND 11 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax…Appellant V e r s u sMuktar Shamshuddin Shaikh…Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Ms. Shambhavi Rao, Advocate for the Respondent.
TAX APPEAL NO.56 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax…Appellant
V e r s u s
…Gangadhar Narsingdas AgarwalRespondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.Ms. Vinita Palyekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
AND
TAX APPEAL NO.9 OF 2017
The Commissioner of Income Tax…Appellant V e r s u sMuktar Minerals Pvt. Ltd.…Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Coram :-M. S. SONAK &
C. V. BHADANG, JJ.
Date :18th November, 2019.
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Tax Department, onthe basis of written instructions, seeks leave to withdraw theseappeals as the tax effect in these Tax Appeals is less than₹ 1 Crore. This, withdrawal is sought for in the light of Circulardated 08.08.2019.
2.Accordingly, we allow the withdrawal of these appeals.
These appeals are disposed off as withdrawn.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
arp/*
M. S. SONAK, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.