Tax Case Appeal v. Late Shri. N.srinivasan, Through L/Hs. Respondent Tax Case Appeal Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Against The Order Of The Income Tax Appel
High Court
06 Dec 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tax Case Appeal v. Late Shri. N.srinivasan, Through L/Hs. Respondent Tax Case Appeal Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Against The Order Of The Income Tax Appel
Date of order
06 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax Case Appeal v. Late Shri. N.srinivasan, Through L/Hs. Respondent Tax Case Appeal Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Against The Order Of The Income Tax Appel, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal under Section 41, Section 260A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Tax Case Appeal No. 1779 of 2008The Commissioner of Income-Tax,Chennai.Appellant Vs.Late Shri. N.Srinivasan, through L/Hs.RespondentTax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 28.03.2008 made in ITA No.2229/Mds/2006.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : No appearance-----
J U D G M E N T(Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai, dated 28.03.2008, made in ITA
http://www.judis.nic.in
"Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the addition of Rs.38,61,559/- made by the Assessing Officer
under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act is not justified?”
2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the High Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open the substantial questions of law for determination in an appropriate case.
Index: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/Noarr
To
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench, Chennai.
DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.and DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
arr
TCA No.1779 of 200806.12.2018.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.