Tax Case (Appeal) v. M/S.s.s. Engineers & Builders
High Court
07 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tax Case (Appeal) v. M/S.s.s. Engineers & Builders
Date of order
07 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tax Case (Appeal) v. M/S.s.s. Engineers & Builders, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman This Tax Case has been filed by the Revenue, calling inquestion the correctness of the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 24.9.2012 made inITA No.1329/Mds/2012, for the...
Decision: In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 7.2.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Tax Case (Appeal) No.149 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai: Appellant/Appellant Vs.
M/s.S.S. Engineers & Builders, No.25/12, 19th Street, Jai Nagar, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106.
: Respondent/ Respondent
Tax Case filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C'Bench, Chennai, dated 24.9.2012 made in ITA No.1329/Mds/2012,against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (AppealsVIII), Chennai-34 made in ITA No.77/10-11(A) VIII dated15.03.2012 for the Assessment year 2008-09 and against the orderof the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-V, Chennai-34 made in ABKFS0845G, dated 24.12.2010 for the Assessment year2008-09.
For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
This Tax Case has been filed by the Revenue, calling inquestion the correctness of the order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai, dated 24.9.2012 made inITA No.1329/Mds/2012, for the Assessment Year 2008-2009, byraising the following substantial question of law:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Appellate Tribunal was right indeleting the disallowance made u/s. 40(a)(ia) inrespect of Labour Charges paid, without deducting
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TDS, on the ground that the assessee had alreadypaid the amounts and nothing remained payable andSection 40(a)(ia) is applicable only where theamount remains payable, and not to amounts paid?"
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned SeniorStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated thatappeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before theHigh Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceedRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the Appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn, keeping open thesubstantial question of law for determination in appropriatecases. No costs.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar// True Copy//
ssk.
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai
2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Appeals (VIII), Chennai-600 034.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle V,Chennai-34.
+1cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate, SR.No.9744.
SR(CO)CSR: 17.03.2020
TC(A) No.149 of 2013
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.