Case LawHigh Court › Tax Case Appeal v. M/S.theekathir Press...

Tax Case Appeal v. M/S.theekathir Press Of Cpi(M), Madurai-18

High Court 06 Jul 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tax Case Appeal v. M/S.theekathir Press Of Cpi(M), Madurai-18
Date of order
06 Jul 2020
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax Case Appeal v. M/S.theekathir Press Of Cpi(M), Madurai-18, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 02.1.2019 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR Tax Case Appeal No.8 of 2016The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai...Appellant VsM/s.Theekathir Press of CPI(M),Madurai-18....Respondent M/s.Theekathir Press of CPI(M),Madurai-18....Respondent APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 29.5.2015 in ITA No.2727/Mds/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench for the assessment year 2010-11. For Appellant : Ms.V.Pushpa and Ms.S.Premalatha, JSCFor Respondent :Mr.Uttam Cheriyan Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The appeal was admitted on 19.1.2016 on the following substantial question of law : http://www.judis.nic.in “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right AND N.SATHISH KUMAR,J RS in law in holding that the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act are applicable only to the amounts of expenditure, which are payable as on 31[st] March of the relevant previous year and it cannot be invoked to disallow expenditure, which had been actually paid during the previous year, without deduction of tax at source ?” 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw this appeal on account of low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limit fixed in the said circular under exceptional clauses mentioned in the circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs. Internet : Yes To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench. TCA.No.8 of 2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan