In Tax Case G8 v. Re§P0Ndent, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
,£
WV
mmanaam
p
IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS%RH AT BILASPUR
TAx CASE g8
APPEALLANT :-ffcOMMISSIONER oéINcoME TAX*.«WRAIPug (C3,) Xxm‘@‘VERSUS
.[I""]
RE§P0NDENT:-
/M/s[Rajes‘h][ Strips][ Limited,535-C,]
Urla Industrial Area Raipur(C.G)
EAL U/sr 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 196
1.
/‘
¥
K
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.