Tax -Central-1 v. Forum Sales Pvt. Ltd
High Court
21 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax -Central-1 v. Forum Sales Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
21 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax -Central-1 v. Forum Sales Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Decision delivered on: 21.07.2023
+ ITA 551/2022 & CM APPL. 55569/2022
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX -CENTRAL-1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha Choudhary and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advs. versus FORUM SALES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: None.
+ ITA 554/2022 & CM APPL. 55597/2022
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -CENTRAL-1
..... Appellant
Through: Mr Aseem Chawla, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Pratishtha Choudhary and Mr Aditya Gupta, Advs.
versus
FORUM SALES PVT. LTD
..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
1. These appeals concern Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 [ITA No.551/2022] and AY 2011-12 [ITA No.554/2022].
2. Via these appeals, challenge is laid to the order of the Income Tax
ITA Nos.551/2022 & 554/2022 Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Act”] dated 04.12.2019.
3. It is not in dispute that no incriminating material was found vis-à-visthe said AYs which, we are told, are completed AYs.
4. Even according to Mr Aseem Chawla, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, the issue raised in the above-captioned appeals stands covered by the judgment rendered by a coordinate bench of this court in CIT v. Kabul Chawla, 380 ITR 573.
5. The aforementioned judgment has been affirmed by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 481.
6. Thus according to us, no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the above-captioned appeals.
7. Consequently, the appeals and the pending applications are closed.
8. Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
JULY 21, 2023
aj
ITA Nos.551/2022 & 554/2022 Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.