In Tax -(Central)-3 v. Nahid Finlease Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~54
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1483/2018
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX -(CENTRAL)-3
..... Appellant Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
versus
NAHID FINLEASE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R% 12.02.2019
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time to file the relevant documents. Liberty granted. The relevant documents shall be filed before the next date.
List on 13.05.2019.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2019 aj
PRATEEK JALAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.