In Tax (Central) Ii v. M/S Tips Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: Mr.Sahadevan is unable to point out whether the respondents have at all challenged the same.
Decision: Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1570 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income
Tax (Central) II ..Appellant
vs.
M/s Tips Industries Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Deepak Tralshawala with Mr.V.S.Hadade for respondents.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant
and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. We
have perused the impugned order. The Tribunal in
paragraph 3 has observed that for the earlier assessment
years right from the assessment year 1991-92 onwards the
same order has been consistently followed and in view of
the same the Tribunal has refused to interfere and decided
in favour of the assessee. Mr.Sahadevan is unable to
point out whether the respondents have at all challenged
the same. Only one of the grounds states that the
appellant has challenged the order for the assessment year
1991-92 by way of an appeal being appeal Lodging No.1370
of 2005. Mr.Sahadevan is not aware of any such appeal and
he does not know what has happened to the same. There is
no other appeal filed by the revenue, hence, the Tribunal
has followed the same view. We do not find any
substantial question of law involved in the above as the
revenue has already accepted the said view consistently
for the last several years. Hence, the appeal stands
dismissed.
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J
KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.