Case LawHigh Court › Tax (Central) Ii v. M/S Tips Industries...

Tax (Central) Ii v. M/S Tips Industries Pvt.ltd

High Court 25 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax (Central) Ii v. M/S Tips Industries Pvt.ltd
Date of order
25 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax (Central) Ii v. M/S Tips Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Mr.Sahadevan is unable to point out whether the respondents have at all challenged the same.

Decision: Hence, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1570 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) II ..Appellant vs. M/s Tips Industries Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondents Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Deepak Tralshawala with Mr.V.S.Hadade for respondents. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. We have perused the impugned order. The Tribunal in paragraph 3 has observed that for the earlier assessment years right from the assessment year 1991-92 onwards the same order has been consistently followed and in view of the same the Tribunal has refused to interfere and decided in favour of the assessee. Mr.Sahadevan is unable to point out whether the respondents have at all challenged the same. Only one of the grounds states that the appellant has challenged the order for the assessment year 1991-92 by way of an appeal being appeal Lodging No.1370 of 2005. Mr.Sahadevan is not aware of any such appeal and he does not know what has happened to the same. There is no other appeal filed by the revenue, hence, the Tribunal has followed the same view. We do not find any substantial question of law involved in the above as the revenue has already accepted the said view consistently for the last several years. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed. KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan