Case Law › High Court › Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindusta...

Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Polyamides

High Court 10 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Jul 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindustan Polyamides, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax Central-III, Mumbai ..Appellant versus M/s. Hindustan Polyamides & Fibres Ltd., Mumbai ..Respondent Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant. Mr. S. J. Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. . It is submitted at the Bar that the questions raised in this Appeal are covered by Judgment reported in [2007]290 ITR 667 (SC) [2007]290 ITR 667 (SC)Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Lakshmi MachineWorks. Following the Judgment, the Appeal is Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Lakshmi Machine Works. dismissed. ( BILAL NAZKI, J. ) (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.