Tax (Cetral) -3 v. M/S Ramprastha Promoters And
High Court
27 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax (Cetral) -3 v. M/S Ramprastha Promoters And
Date of order
27 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax (Cetral) -3 v. M/S Ramprastha Promoters And, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present appeal alongwith pending application is dismissed on account of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 682/2023 & CM APPL. 62186/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX (CETRAL) -3
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. S.C. with Mr. Parth Semwal, Jr. S.C., Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Jr. S.C., Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms. Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur and Ms. Paridhi Kohli, Advocates
versus
M/S RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND
DEVELOPER PVT. LTD.
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Piyush Kaushik and Mr. Tanveer
Zaki, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R27.09.2024
%
1.The Revenue has filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 23.09.2022 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 5792/Del/2017 for the Assessment Year 2013-14.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue, at the outset, states
that the tax effect involved in the present case is below the threshold limit of ₹2 crores, as stipulated in the circular dated 17.09.2024. The learned counsel
also does not dispute that the subject matter does not fall in any of the exceptions, as provided in the said circular.
3.Accordingly, the present appeal alongwith pending application is dismissed on account of low tax effect.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 ns
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.